Hypothetical consequences of AI
Some observers foresee the development of systems that are far more intelligent and complex than anything currently known. One name for these hypothetical systems is artilects.
With the introduction of artificially intelligent non-deterministic systems, many ethical issues will arise. Many of these issues have never been encountered by humanity.
Over time, debates have tended to focus less and less on "possibility" and more on "desirability", as emphasized in the "Cosmist" (versus "Terran") debates initiated by Hugo De Garis and Kevin Warwick. A Cosmist, according to de Garis, is actually seeking to build more intelligent successors to the human species. The emergence of this debate suggests that desirability questions may also have influenced some of the early thinkers "against".
Some issues that bring up interesting ethical questions are:
- Determining the sentience of a system we create.
- Can AI be defined in a graded sense?
- Freedoms and rights for these systems.
- Designing systems that are far more impressive than any one human
- Deciding how much safe-guards to design into these systems
- Seeing how much learning capability a system needs to replicate human thought, or how well it could do tasks without it (eg expert system)
- The Singularity